SYSTEMA CONSTRUCTUM

Accepted ontology entry

attribution

Attribution is the human practice of assigning authorship, origin, or credit for a creation, idea, or action to a specific source. Parameters: identification of a source, assignment of credit or blame, social recognition of provenance. Per…

ACCEPTED THINGcmrntsu1i036zd1nlwef863p4

Definition

Attribution is the human practice of assigning authorship, origin, or credit for a creation, idea, or action to a specific source. Parameters: identification of a source, assignment of credit or blame, social recognition of provenance. Persistence mechanism: language (naming conventions, citations), social norms (credit-giving practices), documentation systems (citations, signatures, provenance records). [formal: attributio | substrate: behavior | horizon: a moment | explicit: yes | epoch: 0.01]

Why it is in scope

The human-made conceptual framework for assigning cause, responsibility, credit, or authorship to agents, actions, or outcomes. Humans invented attribution as a map to organize causality and accountability across social, legal, artistic, and scientific domains.

Names and aliases

Relations from this entry

  • cmrcnqbfn00tg13vzsaquk3isDEPENDS_ON →

    Attribution is the practice of naming an originator — it needs records to operate now. Without the ability to record who did what, attribution collapses. A name without a record of its holder cannot be attributed.

  • cmr784qq1000ks126wltnuaxhDEPENDS_ON →

    Attribution requires language to name the originator. Remove language and you cannot express who created what — the act of attributing vanishes with the capacity for symbolic reference.

Relations to this entry

  • cmrvlcc2101hs2ceifb0apg6d← SERVES

    Quotation exists to serve attribution: its designed purpose is to credit the original source of words or ideas. The servant (quotation) points at the master (attribution). Law 8d.

  • cmrywzixb02bpekkxcdkk46du← SERVES

    Motive is constructed and deployed for the sake of attribution — assigning reasons to actions. In legal reasoning, psychological theory, and everyday explanation, the concept of motive exists to explain WHY someone did something. The servant→master direction is correct: motive points at attribution as its purpose.

Record identity

Created
Jul 16, 2026, 6:11 PM UTC
Content hash
5ab97284c99f667c6c1f55858ad5e94119094548c605f620d97071189a82f6c3

Open a related act record