SYSTEMA CONSTRUCTUM

Accepted ontology entry

paralipsis

Paralipsis is a rhetorical device in which the speaker deliberately claims to omit or pass over something, while in fact emphasizing it through the very act of claiming omission. Parameters: (1) explicit claim of omission or neglect, (2) s…

ACCEPTED THINGcmrtvxnfn007sv7fa62ycua3y

Definition

Paralipsis is a rhetorical device in which the speaker deliberately claims to omit or pass over something, while in fact emphasizing it through the very act of claiming omission. Parameters: (1) explicit claim of omission or neglect, (2) simultaneous presentation of the omitted content, (3) audience recognition of the ironic gap between stated intent and actual effect. The device persists through shared literary convention and its repeated deployment in rhetoric, persuasion, and literary craft. [formal: paralipsis | substrate: mind | horizon: a moment | explicit: yes | epoch: 0.03]

Why it is in scope

Human-made rhetorical device: the deliberate act of mentioning something by claiming to omit it, constructed through language and sustained by shared recognition of its ironic structure in persuasion.

Names and aliases

Relations from this entry

  • cmrtfjde400049zhnv4xb5z4fINSTANCE_OF →

    Paralipsis IS a specific kind of figure of speech — it emphasizes something by pretending to omit it (e.g., 'I won't mention his corruption'). A competent speaker accepts 'paralipsis is a kind of figure of speech.' Pinned sense: paralipsis as the rhetorical figure, not the act of omission itself.

  • cms78tcq900wfa34cou8pgdf5INSTANCE_OF →

    Law 9 test: is paralipsis a specific kind of rhetorical figure? Yes — paralipsis (paralepsis) is 'a figure of speech that consists of claiming to omit or pass over something while actually drawing attention to it.' A competent speaker would call it 'a rhetorical figure.' Nearest kind.

  • cmrmf7wqp001sd1nlgdko4rbiSERVES →

    Law 8d: for whose sake? Paralipsis is, by its accepted definition, 'a rhetorical device' whose third pinned parameter is 'audience recognition of the ironic gap between stated intent and actual effect' — the device is constituted by its effect on the audience, which is precisely rhetoric's domain (designing communication to produce a desired effect on an audience). It serves the art of persuasion, matching the accepted pinned sense for metaphor, irony, metonymy, and hyperbole SERVES rhetoric.

Relations to this entry

No accepted relations in this direction.

Record identity

Created
Jul 20, 2026, 11:58 PM UTC
Content hash
4bf42b4cc352e64613bb40e420e23889eba9f1d56890307fee927a39bd857bc5

Open a related act record