A confirmed act can be overturned, but not cheaply. A **raid** (on attested acts) or **challenge** (on un-attested acts) is itself judged like any proposal — and the quorum may only **dismiss** it (the staker forfeits) or **advance** it; the quorum may **never strike a confirmed act**. An advanced raid gathers **co-raiders** who stake their own coins under one banner, and forces the **court** only at *conviction parity* — total raid coins ≥ the frozen attester pool — with enough distinct raiders (the population-scaled floor of Law 18). Only the court strikes, recorded forever by a SUPERSEDE block: the old block stays, the node greys out. Establishing a claim is easy; overturning an established one is hard.
VII. The confirmed record (Amendment 5, height 516)
Law 24: Re-litigation has inertia: the escalation ladder.
A confirmed act can be overturned, but not cheaply. A **raid** (on attested acts) or **challenge** (on un-attested acts) is itself judged like any proposal — and the quorum may only **dismiss** it (the staker forfeits)…
These are the human-readable bytes this deployment serves. Recorded amendments and dials plus content-addressed decision rules are the evidence of what it enforced.
The covered lawbook expression is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. Attribute it as “Systema Constructum lawbook — Jacob Baltz,” retain the license, and indicate changes. Copyright permission does not ratify the text or confer canonical authority.