If an act was ruled and simply stood, the contradicted judges lose only a small fraction of their stake and the confirmed side splits that reduced pool plus the concurrence bonus. If an act was actually fought by raid or challenge and resolved there, the contradicted judges lose the full stake and the confirmed side takes the full parimutuel. Mere dissent should be survivable; being wrong in a real fight should not be cheap.
VIII. Amendment 7 — rate-gated filing, judge settlement at the ruling
Law 27: Soft when it stood, hard when it was fought.
If an act was ruled and simply stood, the contradicted judges lose only a small fraction of their stake and the confirmed side splits that reduced pool plus the concurrence bonus. If an act was actually fought by raid o…
These are the human-readable bytes this deployment serves. Recorded amendments and dials plus content-addressed decision rules are the evidence of what it enforced.
The covered lawbook expression is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. Attribute it as “Systema Constructum lawbook — Jacob Baltz,” retain the license, and indicate changes. Copyright permission does not ratify the text or confer canonical authority.