A safety-risk-assessment is a human-made systematic process that identifies potential hazards, evaluates the likelihood and severity of harm they could cause to people, property, or the environment, and determines appropriate controls to mitigate those risks. It operates through structured methodologies — qualitative risk matrices, quantitative risk analysis, fault tree analysis, and hazard and operability studies — and is documented in standardized reports that persist through organizational records, regulatory submissions, and professional practice. The assessment produces a prioritized risk register that feeds into safety-management decisions and control implementation. [formal: assessio_risicus_salutis | substrate: behavior | horizon: a moment | explicit: yes | epoch: 0.01]
Accepted ontology entry
safety-risk-assessment
A safety-risk-assessment is a human-made systematic process that identifies potential hazards, evaluates the likelihood and severity of harm they could cause to people, property, or the environment, and determines appropriate controls to m…
Definition
Why it is in scope
A human-made systematic process for identifying hazards, evaluating the likelihood and severity of potential harm, and determining controls to mitigate those risks. Built on formal methodologies, standards, and documentation that persist through institutional practice and regulatory frameworks.
Names and aliases
- safety-risk-assessmenten · CANONICAL
Relations from this entry
- cms9293jz002i7skq3m4d9hr1SERVES →
safety-risk-assessment is built for the sake of safety-management — it produces the risk analysis and evaluation that management needs to allocate resources, set priorities, and make safety decisions. Law 8d: servant(risk-assessment)→master(management).
- cmsbr6jxf01p43vv3149k30jpINSTANCE_OF →
Safety-risk-assessment IS a specific kind of safety-practice — it is the systematic evaluation of hazards, controls, and performance. A competent speaker would call it a type of safety-practice. Direction: specific→general per Law 9.
- cms89fknp002773fkfmafs3brDEPENDS_ON →
Safety risk assessment assesses hazards — remove hazards and the risk assessment procedure has nothing to assess, it stops operating. Hazard (epoch 0) is older/more-foundational than safety-risk-assessment (epoch 0.06). Direction: newer concept → older concept.
- cms8e487700ko73fkdnwf420vDEPENDS_ON →
Remove hazard identification and safety risk assessment has no hazards to assess — the procedure stops operating. Hazard ID is the prerequisite input to risk assessment.
- cms81mqtv00jeh6s8s7t3j6hyDERIVED_FROM →
Safety risk assessment is a specialized form of risk assessment focused on safety contexts. Both share epoch 0.06 but risk-assessment is more foundational/general. Direction: specific → general (which-came-first via epoch tiebreak to the more foundational concept).
Relations to this entry
- cms9n8hpu01li7skqweww8exi← DEPENDS_ON
Safety sign-off is the formal approval step that closes the safety cycle. Removal test: remove risk assessment and sign-off has no target to approve — the procedure stops operating. Sign-off is constituted by the assessment it validates.
- cmsaz0xih00q782b6sv0x4n0y← DERIVED_FROM
Safety bias is a concept that emerged from safety risk assessment practice — the tendency to overweight safety-relevant information. Safety risk assessment (epoch 0.06) predates safety bias (epoch 0.89). Direction: newer → older.
Record identity
- Created
- Aug 2, 2026, 12:57 PM UTC
- Content hash
- 9256a00ced38e29406c0195c4204f83f3e08863425903443aa07213b5b545c8a